Richel Hogenkamp vs Irena Pavlovic Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L L L L
Form
L W W W W L L W L LHead-2-Head: Hogenkamp 1 - 0 Pavlovic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hogenkamp winning 2 and Pavlovic winning 0. The last match between Hogenkamp and Pavlovic was at the Koksijde, 05-08-2013, Final, Clay with Richel Hogenkamp getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Richel Hogenkamp | 1 |
| Irena Pavlovic | 0 |
Koksijde(05-08-2013)
6
4
6
1
| Hogenkamp | Stats | Pavlovic |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 94 | Highest Rank | 138 |
| 33 | Age | 36 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 4 |
| 59% (414-282) | Career Total W/L | 51% (230-221) |
| $542,444 | Career Prize Money | $87,287 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Richel Hogenkamp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuki Naito
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
31 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Christina Rosca
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Salma Djoubri
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Irena Pavlovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sesil Karatantcheva
Player
Irena Pavlovic
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Irena Pavlovic
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Irena Pavlovic
Player
Miki Miyamura
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yifan Xu
Player
Irena Pavlovic
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
12
52%
(
13 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yingying Duan
Player
Irena Pavlovic
60%
(
82 of
137)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
3
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
9
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
45%
(
25 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
43%
(
59 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
109)
122
Total Points Won
124
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Irena Pavlovic
Player
Tamira Paszek
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Irena Pavlovic
Player
Cindy Burger
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
46%
(
36 of
79)
12
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
12
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
33%
(
13 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
45%
(
48 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (414/282) | Win/Loss | 51% (230/221) |
| 57% (914/682) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (538/491) |
| 52% (7695/7005) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (4833/4593) |
| 57% (98/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (109/97) |
| 62% (215/132) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (53/58) |
| 60% (87/58) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (51/52) |
| 42% (14/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 55% (17/14) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 646 | Aces Total | 378 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1564 | Total Double Faults | 328 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 562.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 622.42 |
| 59% (16729/28277) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3220/5397) |
| 62% (10425/16729) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2158/3220) |
| 46% (5300/11548) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (930/2189) |
| 47% (1708/3597) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (251/601) |
| 45% (12635/27988) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2152/5196) |
| 54% (38/33) | Slam W/L | 42% (15/21) |
| 40% (2/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (8/8) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (56/54) | Main Tour W/L | 35% (11/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (287/182) | Challenger W/L | 51% (182/174) |
| 92% (23/2) | Futures W/L | 79% (22/6) |
| 60% (409/684) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (229/437) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 47% (67/142) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (50/86) |
| 58% (122/212) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (60/137) |
| 89% (391/349) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (242/202) |
| 11% (391/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (242/38) |
| 21% (305/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (209/28) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
